Tipping the biosphere

My previous posts have described how critical transitions lead to state shifts, causing abrupt changes and unanticipated effects. Although humans appear to dominate Earth, we have a huge dependence on the biosphere and ecosystem functioning for resource capture, primary production, and decomposition and recycling of nutrients, as well as potentially ecosystem stability (Cardinale et al, 2012). If the relationships mentioned by Cardinale et al (2012) transpose to a planetary scale, the implication is that global biodiversity and species richness positively correlate with the resilience and functioning of the biosphere (Lenton et al. 2013). For this reason, there has been an almost compulsory growth in interest in forecasting biological responses on all temporal and spatial scales (Barnosky et al, 2012).

But how do these changes occur?

Barnosky et al. (2012) describe biological states as neither steady nor in equilibrium, and say critical thresholds may be crossed by a ‘threshold’ effect in incremental values or a ‘sledgehammer’ effect from a large event, such as forest clearance. Localized ecological systems are known to shift abruptly and irreversibly across critical thresholds to new mean conditions outside the range of fluctuation of the previous state (Barnosky et al, 2012). Tipping points in the terrestrial biosphere can also cross continents if vegetation and atmosphere are tightly coupled, (Lenton et al. 2013), potentially becoming global if there are interrelated drivers acting on a global biological or ecological threshold, causing all locations to ‘tip’ simultaneously (Brook et al. 2013). Brook et al (2013) think this is unlikely given the heterogeneity of climate change and ecosystems. Jefferies et al. (2006) show that intercontinental biotic connectivity and coupled regime shifts have been demonstrated by intensive agriculture in western USA, causing dramatic losses of Arctic ecosystem structure and biogeochemical cycling due to increased populations of migrating snow geese, promoted by agricultural crop as increased food source. Similarly, coral reef ecosystems appear to have disappeared globally and suddenly at the Triassic–Jurassic transition, driven by global increase in CO2 causing increased ocean acidity and temperature (Brook et al. 2013).

What are the consequences?

Several extinction events have been linked to oceanic anoxic events, crossing the tipping point in which the onset of anoxia on shelf seas triggered is phosphorus recycling from sediments, fuelling a spread of anoxia, and Lenton et al. (2013) state that the effects on biodiversity were a consequence rather than an intrinsic part of the tipping mechanism. As well as this may be, feedback loops often mean that a biological forcing applied on one scale can cause a critical transition to occur on another scale, for example, anthropogenic selection for younger maturation of individual cod as a result of heavy fishing pressure; and cascades of ecological changes triggered by the removal of top predators (Barnosky et al. 2012). Lenton et al (2013) suggest that species richness is a poor and misleading indicator of Earth-system function, with minimal basis in ecological theory for identifying a number of unique species required to maintain the general health of the biosphere. They also point out the distinction between tipping points in climate or biogeochemical dynamics and subsequent ecological responses to them (Lenton et al. 2013).

To summarize, the terrestrial biosphere, in isolation, is not the right place to be looking for a planetary-scale tipping point; the complex coupled dynamics of the Earth system as a whole need to be assessed (Lenton et al, 2013). Many of the feedbacks, and their consequences for other systems and scales, in the face of changing global climate are as yet unknown. However, planetary scale critical transitions have occurred previously in the biosphere, and evidence suggests that humans are now forcing another such transition, potentially transforming Earth into an irreversible state unknown in human history (Barnosky et al. 2012). As Hobbs et al. (2006) suggest, ‘we should perhaps move away from the one-dimensional dichotomy between natural and human dominated to a more effective depiction of how human beings interact with nature’.

Barnosky et al. (2012) “Approaching a state shift in Earth’s Biosphere”, Nature, 486, 52-58
Brook, B.W. et al. (2013) "Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points?" Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 396–401.

Cardinale, B.J. et al. (2012) "Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity". Nature 486, 59–67
Hobbs, R.J. et al. (2006) "Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order". Global Ecology and Biogeography. 15, 1–7

Jefferies, R.L. et al. (2006) "A biotic agent promotes large-scale catastrophic change in the coastal marshes of Hudson Bay". Journal of Ecology. 94, 234–242

Lenton, T., M., and H. T. P. Williams (2013) “On the origin of planetary-scale tipping points, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 7, 380-382

Planetary Boundaries and Tipping Points explained!

If you do any reading about "tipping points" you'll be bombarded with things like 'planetary boundaries', 'regime shifts', 'critical transitions' and just about every combination of these words. It can be a bit confusing! So I'm going to explain it in what I hope is a much clearer way....

Brook et al. (2013) describe the following:

· Planetary boundary: a concept developed to define a desired operating range for Earth-system features and processes. Crossing a boundary implies damage or loss of existing functions or services across the system.

· Regime shift: a large, relatively rapid reorganization of the state of an ecosystem that can be triggered by synergistic feedbacks. Regime shifts can result from crossing tipping points, and are often hard to anticipate and difficult to reverse.

· Tipping point: the critical point at which strong non-linearities appear in the relationship between ecosystem attributes and drivers; once a tipping point threshold is crossed, the change to a new state is typically rapid and might be irreversible or exhibit hysteresis.

Life on Earth has displayed abrupt and massive changes in the past, so we have no reason to expect that similar global regime shifts will not occur again. These shifts changed ecosystem dynamics worldwide by rising temperatures, changes in rainfall, retreat of polar ice and glaciers, and declining ocean pH amongst others, resulting in profound changes in ecosystem services, biodiversity, and aesthetic values. (Hughes et al. 2013). 

The problem is, not all these planetary boundaries and tipping points have been defined, and crossing these thresholds is unlikely to manifest as sudden and simultaneous collapses worldwide.What if we've already passed unrecognized and unanticipated tipping points as incremental changes accumulate, and are in a slow transition to a new regime? Once a transition occurs, it can be difficult or even impossible to return to the previous state (Barnosky et al, 2012).

This image from Barnosky et al (2012) shows a prediction of Earth ecosystem response as human population grows as does its impact on the environment. Here, the system crosses a tipping point and reaching an alternative stable state.

Human forcing includes transformation of 43% of land to agricultural or urban landscapes, with the remainder of natural landscapes broken up by roads. Even during the last global-scale critical transition, only 30% of Earth’s surface went from being covered by glacial ice to being ice free! Modelling suggests that for a third of Earth, plant species will not be able to migrate quick enough to keep up with climate change, and those that can will have to battle highly fragmented landscapes (Barnosky et al. 2012).

The scientific concept and potential policy implications of tipping points and their consequences have recently attracted considerable interest (Brook et al, 2013) and rightly so. Looking at past global-scale state shifts and the global forcings we continue to exert, suggests that another global-scale state shift is isn't far away, if it has not already begun (Barnosky et al, 2012). The extent and scale of human–biosphere interactions and disruption highlights the need to operate within safe planetary boundaries say Hughes et al, (2013). Regardless, we must address causes of human-driven global change and improve our management of the environment in order to prevent a global-scale state shift, or at least to monitor it as much as possible.

• Barnosky, A., D., Et Al. (2012) “Approaching a state shift in Earth’s Biosphere” Nature, 486, 52-58
• Brook, B.W. et al. (2013) Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 396–401
• Hughes, T., P., S. Carpenter, J. Rockstrom, M. Scheffer, and B. Walker (2013) “Multiscale regime shifts and planetary boundaries” Trends in Ecology & Evolution , 28, 7